Houses of the Mind May 17, 2008
Posted by Brian Pfeifer in Future Development.add a comment
There was a day, long ago when no human lived inside a house. That’s a difficult concept to wrap your head around, because most of us spend most of our time inside houses, offices, factories, or other man made environments. In the past hundred years we’ve also built a wide variety of mobile environments like cars and airplanes. These structures provide many benefits. They help keep us warm in winter, cool in summer, improve food storage, protect us from predators, and generally make our lives better. It’s hard to picture life without even a grass hut or an improved cave, but there was a time before these inventions.
Humans lived for centuries before we invented structures. People were born under the stars, squatted in the wind and rain, found mates, and propagated the species without the benefits of buildings. The eventual shift from living under the canopy of the heavens to the ubiquitous use of buildings had a profound impact on human society social structures. Social interaction tends to shift from the family to the community of people living near each other. Hierarchies based on possession can evolve like city-states, and monarchies. Even warfare makes more sense when the warring parties own towns and cities. The changes that moving into structures has caused or contributed to are so widespread that they are often hard to identify.
Human society is on the cusp of a similar change. We are moving from physical environments to digitally manufactured environments. Now I’m not saying we live in cyberspace, but we are spending more and more time in electronically generated spaces of our own choosing. What is making this possible is the ubiquitous spread of portable digital hardware, especially networked devices. When I drive down the street, I see many people with head bowed and headphones in their ears. They are text-messaging friends, playing video games, or watching videos. The first thing many of us do when we return home, or enter our office is turn on the computer and jump into our email.
Other authors have previously noted how online relationships and communities are affecting society. They tend to be geographically dispersed, open to new members, but insular in ideas. New cell phone applications and handheld devices that take advantage of wireless networks are starting to allow us to take these communities with on the road, outside our structures. Add to that the ability to constantly choose our own audio input, whether that’s rock and roll, ocean waves, or an audio book, and the ability to choose video for visual stimulation, and you have something as profound as building a house. We do not know what impacts this will have on our society. After all, it took millennia for us to build houses with air conditioners, refrigerators, indoor plumbing, even furniture, and just as long to build the society I was born into. What form of society will our children be born into and inherit?
Is Yi So Yeon an Astronaut? May 3, 2008
Posted by Brian Pfeifer in South Korea.add a comment
Some of my Korean friends are concerned about criticisms they have been hearing about Yi So Yeon’s recent visit to the ISS. Apparently, some commentators in the media claim that she’s not an astronaut at all. I have not read any sources making this claim, but it is upsetting to many Koreans.
First they felt great pride in joining the space faring nations. Now they see the event with some bitterness. And it has caused some discussion as to whether or not the trip was a waste of money. Now Yi So Yeon is in the hospital with back pain. The whole experience is starting to sour.
Korea has every right to be proud of their new astronaut. According to every dictionary I look in, an astronaut is someone who travels to space. Space is defined as that area higher than 100 km in altitude. Some definitions go on further to say an astronaut is someone who is trained to live and work in space. Let’s see…do these criteria apply to Yi So Yeon? Absolutely.
Was she merely a tourist along for the ride? No. She conducted 18 experiments while on orbit. Her selection process in Korea was as rigorous as that of any NASA astronaut. It included both physical and mental tests, even a Marathon, and an English language exam. She worked hard to earn the chance at this flight. She performed well on orbit, and even had an easier time adapting to microgravity than some of the other professionals.
Perhaps the greatest value of her mission was not the science experiments that she completed, nor in the national pride generated. More importantly, The Republic of Korea now has enough experience to decide if they should invest in a space program. Before her flight, they had no real meter stick against which to measure various options. Now the South Korean government can evaluate the costs and benefits of investing future flights, and make decisions wisely.